Postcolonialism
Not the Same as Decoloniality
I should note that I am not a postcolonialist. Unlike postcolonialism (Ᵽ↻™), I use decoloniality as a methodology in my Post–Civilization–Mutual Aid–Localism–Maoism–Third Worldism™ (Ꭾⵞത𐌀𐌋𐒄ՇƜ™) aka Post–Civ MTW™ (ꛠ𖥕ꚸ𖢧𖢊ꛕꚹꚴꛔ𖦚ꛃ™).
The reason is simple: Postcolonialism, which was arguably founded by Edward Wadie Said (Arabic, إِدْوَارْد وَدِيع سَعِيد [MP3], ⫰Ɪd°wār°d Wadīʿ Saʿīd), is strongly influenced by the philosophy of poststructuralism (Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, et al.) and the cultural studies framework of postmodernism (Jean–François Lyotard et al.).
Bhaskarian critical realism (ᙖᙍⴽ™), in each of Roy Bhaskar’s four turns, is incompatible with both poststructuralism and postmodernism. That is not to say, however, aspects of each cannot be meticulously salvaged.
Here is a relatively brief listing, including links to literature, of postcolonial perspectives:
Baháʼí Orientalism (interesting reading for a Baháʼí, well, at least for myself)
cultural interface theory (Martin Nakata et al.)
de–Orientalism (Chisu Teresa Ko, inspired by Edward Wadie Said)
Orientalism (the postcolonialism of Edward Wadie Said)
postcolonial reconstruction of the Chicago School (Mary Racelis Hollnsteiner)
postcolonial tendencies in translation in the light of center–periphery pre–conceptual image schema
Third Space theory (Homi K. Bhabha)
